As promised in my last article, let’s objectively
look at what constitutes good governance of a country and then evaluate our
previous (now the caretaker) government performance in terms of these
characteristics.
There is an extremely important
pre-requisite to having a good government before any of the following characteristics
can even be considered. There must be a true separation of powers where the
government, judiciary and legislation are independent and free from
interference. Without this true separation of powers, good governance is but a
dream.
The foremost important characteristic
of good governance is involvement and participation of the people in the country.
This is done ideally through direct election of people representatives (as in
many democratic countries) or less ideally through appointment of people who
represent some ethnic or social-political groups (as in some countries that
still practise monarchy system). The bottom line is, everyone is given equal
right to participate in the government or represented by people they choose. As
such, a fair and clean election system is essential.
Rule of law is the second most
important feature of good governance. It is imperative to have fair and just
laws that are enforced impartially on everyone, including those who walk the
corridor of power.
The third most important quality in
good governance is to promote, observe and implement equity in all government
policies. This feature ensures everyone in the country is treated equally and
free from any form of discriminations due to difference in skin colour, age,
gender, religion, sexual orientation and political affiliation.
Next, we have the C.A.T, competency,
accountability and transparency in governance. A competent government is
effective in carrying out its duties as well as efficient in managing the
available resources of the country. A good government will have systems in place
to make sure members of the government are accountable to the people in the
country while performing their duties. Information on government processes,
utilisation of country resource, policies and laws etc must be freely available
and accessible to anyone in the country who wants to know. This is called
transparency of governance.
For example, an independent evaluation
system is required to monitor the measurable performance of various operational
branches of the government. The evaluation results must be made available and
accessible to the people of the country.
Last but not least, a good government
has positive visions and long term objectives in the development of the
country.
In a nut shell, a good government has positive
visions, and supports active participations of the people, implements rule of
law and practises equity in its policies. It is competent, accountable and transparent
in its operations.
Now, how many of the above qualities does our Malaysian
government have? Is calling for a change of government justified in this coming
13th general election?
1. Participation. We have a democratic system to
elect the government. However, fair and clean election being an essential part
to ensure equal right of participation is missing from the equation. So, I
would say they failed this test.
2.
Rule of law. We have a legal framework that is
based on the common law. However, with the domination of the government over
the judiciary, impartial application of rule of law is hardly seen in the
country when it involved the powers that be. So, they failed this test.
3.
Equity. With so many discriminatory and
preferential policies such as the NEP, quota system etc, Malaysians are constantly
being discriminated by their race, gender, religion and probably the choice of
their pet. It’s definitely a fail.
4. C.A.T. When jet engines were smuggled out from a
military based and sold in South America; when government departments procured
everything at severely inflated prices; when armed militants entered the
country and occupied a village but strangely nobody was accountable for it;
when the MRT project costing billions of ringgit was awarded to a company
without any track records, without an open tender process; what C.A.T are you
talking about. Hence, it is another resounding failure.
5. Vision. You actually mean vision and long term
development objectives? Hahaha. Please don’t make me laugh. From vision 2020, Islam
Hadhari to 1Malaysia, our national vision changed whenever we have a new prime
minister. We didn’t even have a national day slogan in 2012. They failed badly
on this one as well.
The previous (now the caretaker) government of Malaysia has
failed in all the tests that characterise good governance. Is changing
government justified? You make your own judgement, my dear Malaysians.